| 0 comments ]

Appeals Court Refuses To Lift Judge Boasberg's Block On Trump Deportations

With a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has denied President Donald Trump’s request to halt US District Judge James Boasberg's decision that blocked his proclamation applying the Alien Enemies Act to support deportations of suspected members of a Venezuelan gang.

The Justice Department had urged the three-judge panel on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to immediately block Boasberg’s order, casting it as an intrusion on the president’s executive authority over national security.

Judges Karen Henderson and Patricia Millett opposed the administration’s request while Judge Justin Walker dissented.

In a concurrence, Henderson said that:

“the Executive’s burdens are comparatively modest compared to the plaintiffs’. Lifting the injunctions risks exiling plaintiffs to a land that is not their country of origin.”

Millett, meanwhile, praised the district court’s handling of the case and said:

“there is neither jurisdiction nor reason for this court to interfere at this very preliminary stage or to allow the government to singlehandedly moot the Plaintiffs’ claims by immediately removing them beyond the reach of their lawyers or the court.”

Walker’s dissent stated that:

“the government has ... shown that the district court’s orders threaten irreparable harm to delicate negotiations with foreign powers on matters concerning national security.”

Republicans have criticized Boasberg as allegedly overstepping his power by questioning President Donald Trump's national security authority.

The Trump administration could now seek emergency review from the Supreme Court, but the case is meanwhile progressing in Boasberg’s court.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/26/2025 - 17:20
https://ift.tt/5OMKkz2
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/5OMKkz2
via IFTTT

Appeals Court Refuses To Lift Judge Boasberg's Block On Trump Deportations SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Judge Reverses Decision, Says Unions Can Sue Over Federal Worker Firings

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

Unions representing federal workers can sue the Trump administration over its mass terminations, as opposed to being restricted to bringing challenges to federal labor boards, a judge said on March 24.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup said that the boards would not be able to adjudicate the unions’ claims that the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) violated the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine.

“In sum, but for district court jurisdiction, the public-sector unions will be precluded from judicial recourse and relief even for their separation-of-powers claim,” Alsup said in the ruling.

The American Federation of Government Employees and other unions sued the administration in February over OPM directives sent to agency heads, which aimed to further President Donald Trump’s goal of reducing the federal workforce and said agencies should fire newer employees who were not deemed critical to the mission of each agency.

Alsup concluded on Feb. 27 that OPM lacked authority to hire or fire any employees outside of the office but also ruled that while he had jurisdiction over newly fired workers, unions must take their complaints to federal labor boards rather than the courts.

In the new order, Alsup said he was wrong, breaking from three recent rulings in other cases.

The claims brought by the unions, including that OPM violated the separation of powers by directing other agencies to terminate their employees, are standard constitutional law questions that are considered by the courts, the judge said.

The expertise of the Federal Labor Relations Authority and the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board would not help resolve the claims that revolve around OPM’s authority and do not directly implicate the Civil Service Reform Act, which outlines the system for reviewing terminations and other personnel action against federal employees, according to the ruling.

Three other U.S. district judges have found that similar cases should go before a federal board, but those cases are different in part because they challenged separate aspects of the mass terminations, such as Trump’s order to agencies to carry out firings through plans called reductions-in-force, Alsup said.

The judge ordered parties in the case, including the government, to file responses to his order by March 28.

The American Federation of Government Employees and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, plaintiffs in the case, did not respond to requests for comment. The U.S. Department of Justice did not return an inquiry.

Alsup and another judge recently ordered the government to reinstate nearly 25,000 newer workers whom officials had fired across 18 agencies. An appeals court upheld Alsup’s order, prompting the administration to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices have not yet weighed in on the matter.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/26/2025 - 17:00
https://ift.tt/J7GlOUM
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/J7GlOUM
via IFTTT

Judge Reverses Decision, Says Unions Can Sue Over Federal Worker Firings SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Trump Vows To Probe Ashli Babbitt Homicide, Consider Comp Fund For Pardoned J6ers

President Trump on Tuesday vowed that he would bring new scrutiny to the Department of Justice's handling of the killing of Ashli Babbitt by a Capitol police officer during the Jan 6, 2021 riot, and to explore the possibility of a compensation fund for the 1,500 Capitol riot defendants he pardoned.   

Trump's promises came in a Roosevelt Room interview with Newsmax's Greg Kelly. When Kelly asked Trump about the DOJ continuing to mount a defense against a $30 million wrongful death claim filed by Babbitt's husband, Trump said he wasn't aware of it but would look into the matter: 

"Well, I'll look into that. I mean, you're just telling me that for the first time, I haven't heard that. I'm a big fan of Ashli Babbitt. And Ashli Babbitt was a really good person who was a big MAGA fan, Trump fan. And she was innocently standing there; they even say trying to sort of hold back the crowd. And a man did something to her that was unthinkable when he shot her. And I think it's a disgrace. I'm going to look into that. I did not know that."

Unarmed and posing no threat of death or serious harm, Babbitt was shot to death by Capitol Police on Jan. 6 (via
Stark Realities
)

Babbitt was shot and killed by US Capitol Police (USCP) Lieutenant Michael Byrd as she attempted to climb through a broken window that was part of an interior doorway close to the House chamber. Though the unarmed, 5'2", 115-pound Babbitt posed no imminent threat of inflicting death or serious injury as she awkwardly navigated the narrow space -- with a furniture barricade still ahead of her --  Boyd opted against using any type of nonlethal force, and instead shot her from an ambush position, killing her with a bullet that perforated her trachea and lung. 

While it's been little-publicized by major media or leftists who screech that Babbitt "got what she deserved," Byrd had some serious disciplinary issues before Jan. 6, with some of the incidents involving the irresponsible handling and even firing of his weapon.  

Despite the damning facts of the case, leftists in and out of media have treated Byrd as a hero for fending off a nonexistent "insurrection." He was not only officially cleared of wrongdoing, but promoted to the rank of captain in 2023. In Tuesday's interview, Kelly also asked Trump how he felt about Byrd still being on duty, with a pay raise and higher rank. The president replied: 

"I think it's a disgrace. I'm going to take a look at it. I'm going to look at that, too. His reputation was ... I won't even say; let's find out about his reputation. We're going to find out. But I watched that and I saw that. And by the way, she was killed, but nobody else was killed."

Noting that the 1,500 Jan 6 defendants pardoned by Trump had "lost opportunity, lost income," Kelly asked Trump if there was any plan in the works to compensate Jan 6ers for their excessively harsh treatment.  "There's talk about that," said Trump. "A lot of the people that are in the government now talk about it, because a lot of the people in government really like that group of people. They were patriots as far as I was concerned...they were treated very unfairly.”

Given how the left went bonkers over Trump's pardons, the reaction to a reparations package for Jan 6ers would be a sight to behold. 

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/26/2025 - 16:40
https://ift.tt/JIiCzMY
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/JIiCzMY
via IFTTT

Trump Vows To Probe Ashli Babbitt Homicide, Consider Comp Fund For Pardoned J6ers SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

"We've Created A Class Of People Who Are Effectively Grifters" - Rubino Rages At US Govt's "Big Money-Laundering Operation"

Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

Analyst and financial writer John Rubino warned last October that “Chaos is Coming.”  

With exploding Tesla dealerships, mass deportations of violent gangs, DOGE uncovering massive fraud and waste, and an out-of-control Leftist judiciary trying to stop President Trump at every turn, you could say chaos is here.  

Rubino contends it’s not going away anytime soon as government grifters are going to try to keep the cash flowing.   Now, AG Pam Bondi says her office is going after the fraudsters ripping off America. Rubino explains,

We are finding out that the federal government is a big money laundering operation.  There are so many different ways and so many different avenues that take cash from taxpayers or newly created cash . . . and it basically funnels it to political operatives, political class and the ‘expert’ class all around the world...

We have created this class of people who are effectively grifters . . . because they don’t do anything worthwhile at all.  Do you think that think-tanks produce anything of value, or lobbyists or Washington law firms or regulators?  The regulator is basically on a long job interview for the company you are regulating.  

You prove you are a team player and then Pfizer hires you for 10 times your FDA salary.  So, everywhere you look it’s a form of money laundering.

So, now interest payments are spiraling to infinity with massive amounts of debt and currency creation.  Rubino says, “We have hit the death spiral point for the dollar and the other big fiat currencies, which means the cost to maintain this debt starts to spiral out of control and people lose faith in the currency or the currency collapses or you have a currency reset..."

" What is really interesting about the Trump Administration is it contains a lot of gold bugs...

There is a decent chance of instead of having this gigantic collapse because the dollar is basically evaporating, that this government will be smart enough to do the monetary reset.  Go back to a gold standard . . . go back to some sort of commodity base standard where we peg the dollar to something that is real and cannot be created in infinite quantities on a printing press.  It could be we do that without insane amounts of pain and stress, but it would still be painful.  Anybody who has dollars will watch those dollars be devalued dramatically.”

In this scenario, the dollar sinks in value.  What happens to gold?  Rubino says, 

Everybody who runs the numbers says gold has to be $10,000 per ounce at a minimum and maybe much higher.  Gold has to go way up in price in a currency reset. . . . So, your gold becomes much more valuable, and your silver gets pulled along by gold and goes up by some multiple of gold’s percentage gains.  If gold goes up three times, silver will go up five to ten times.”

Rubino thinks Europe is headed for war with Russia or civil war.  Either way, the Euro will not survive.  Rubino says the domestic violence will continue here in America but thinks the Deep State won’t stop President Trump’s agenda.  Rubino also says everybody should concentrate on owning real things such as farm land, gold, silver and a good vehicle.  Rubino also says some emergency food and a garden are good ideas too.

There is much more in the 58-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with financial writer John Rubino of the popular site called Rubino.Substack.com for 3.25.25.

*  *  *

To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here

John Rubino is a prolific financial writer, and you can see some of his work for free at Rubino.Substack.com

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/26/2025 - 16:20
https://ift.tt/mdG4FRw
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/mdG4FRw
via IFTTT

"We've Created A Class Of People Who Are Effectively Grifters" - Rubino Rages At US Govt's "Big Money-Laundering Operation" SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Biden's Perjury

Authored by Techno Fog via The Reactionary,

Part of the problem with the Freedom of Information Act is the timeliness of production. If you file a simple request it might take over 7 years for a response. (It happened to us.) Even where you file suit, like we do, you’re probably looking at over a year to get responsive documents. And that’s not even counting the exceptions the Government asserts, whether it be “privacy” or the need to redact embarrassing information or, in the case of COVID-19, to further the cover-up.

And while timeliness and unnecessary redactions aren’t exactly related, they help to serve the same purpose. In the case of late production, many times the story has lost steam or the subject of the documents is no longer in office.

That’s the necessary lead-in to what we have today: President Joe Biden’s written answers to questions from Special Counsel Robert Hur, available here.

I believe this is the first time these have been published. We just got them today; the Government was in no rush to hand them over, though we appreciate the fact that they aren’t redacted. Small victories, I guess.

These answers were prepared - undoubtedly with the assistance of counsel - in April 2023, and they address Biden’s handling of classified documents at his homes and the sharing of classified information to his ghostwriter, Mark Zwonitzer.

If you recall, Special Counsel Hur was appointed after the disclosure that classified documents were found at President Biden’s homes and his office in Washington. Compared to the investigations of Trump, the Biden inquiry was, for lack of a better word, soft: searches were conducted without FBI monitors, Biden’s lawyers negotiated the terms of searches with a US Attorney appointed by Biden. (Our recap into the Biden classified documents saga goes into greater detail.)

The issue with Biden’s handling of classified materials wasn’t necessarily the possession of those materials, though that is a criminal offense. It’s that he lied about it to Special Counsel Hur. These written answers - first published in this article - are important in that they are made with thought and care, as compared to Biden’s rambling interview with Special Counsel Hur, where he was a bit slow and forgetful.

And these answers are provable deceit, though it would have been a near-impossible task to convince a DC jury to convict one of their own. Here are some examples of the lies.

Here, you see Biden explaining he used the term “classified” with his ghostwriter (Zwonitzer) in a generic sense. However, in a recorded February 2017 interview, Biden told his ghostwriter that he had “just found all the classified stuff downstairs.” Biden was also found to have read “verbatim” from a number of classified notebooks and remarked to his ghostwriter that some of the documents “may be classified.”

Again, we see the same pattern. Biden “did not know” his garage contained classified documents. He further states: “I do not recall ever sharing any marked classified documents with Mr. Zwonitzer, and I never would have done so intentionally.” As to that first quote, Hur was skeptical, concluding that Biden actually “maintained these [garage] files himself.”

And finally, Biden explains that his possession of classified materials (notecards) should be deemed appropriate because he understood them to be his “property.”

To close - while this matter has concluded, and while Biden fades into obscurity (the Democrats don’t miss him), we thought his written responses deserved publication. It would have been nice to not have to deal with over a year of government delays - even with ongoing litigation - but this is the hand we’re dealt.

Tyler Durden Tue, 03/25/2025 - 17:00
https://ift.tt/9tHV2P1
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/9tHV2P1
via IFTTT

Biden's Perjury SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend