| 0 comments ]

US Cattle Herd Shrinks To 1951 Lows As Beef Crisis Deepens

Update: USDA figures are in: the nation's cattle herd has plunged to a 74-year low, totaling 86.7 million head.

*   *   * 

Ahead of this afternoon's 3 pm est. USDA release of official US cattle inventory data, estimates compiled by Bloomberg forecast the herd will be at its lowest level in more than seven decades. The ongoing cattle supply crunch continues to push supermarket ground beef prices to record highs.

Bloomberg cited estimates from four analysts that expect the US cattle herd as of Jan. 1 will decline by .7% from one year ago. This would mark the lowest level since 1951 and extend the decline for a sixth straight year.

We have thoroughly documented the cattle crisis resulting in higher ground beef prices at the supermarket:

The average retail price for ground beef at the supermarket, calculated by USDA, recently topped $5.61 per pound. Before Covid, that prices was around $3.81.

Live cattle futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange have surged to record highs. 

The latest CFTC data via Bloomberg shows money managers boosted bullish live cattle bets by 2,764 net-long positions to 161,970 last week, the most bullish in about five years - and nearing levels of the most bullish ever on record. 

On top of all this, the nation's cattle crisis is set to worsen with new pressures: President Donald Trump's anticipated tariff war 2.0, which is expected to tighten domestic beef supplies. 

"All of the things he is talking about have potentially negative consequences more so than anything positive," Derrell Peel, a professor of agricultural economics at Oklahoma State University, told Bloomberg in a previous report, adding, "Our fate's pretty well determined in the cattle industry in the US for the next two to four years – and it's not looking good."

About a year ago, the USDA projected that the cattle herd could begin rebuilding by 2025. However, that timeline has since shifted to 2027. The reason is primarily because of high interest rates and poor pasture conditions in the Midwest. 

"Even as the beef industry has experienced periods of growth over the past decades, the animal count has dropped almost 40% since a peak in 1975. During the current downcycle, which started in 2020, the herd has been shrinking at the fastest pace since the big farm crisis of the 1980s," Bloomberg noted.

All things point to higher beef prices this year. 

Tyler Durden Fri, 01/31/2025 - 15:45
https://ift.tt/1uyK8gB
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/1uyK8gB
via IFTTT

US Cattle Herd Shrinks To 1951 Lows As Beef Crisis Deepens SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Apple Slides After iPhone Sales Miss, China Revenues Unexpectedly Tumble

Ahead of earnings of the world's largest company which however has been going through a painful period of remarkable underperformance vs the Nasdaq, UBS had Apple sentiment at a quite subdued 5/10, saying that a number of folks are "treating the name as a funding short – a view mirrored in its elevated short interest (though it’s not a stand-out short in our Prime book, and the recent -11% pullback may have taken out some of that caution)." That said, UBS writes that there’s "no doubt AAPL finds itself well-positioned to mediate consumer AI adoption – a fact that keeps long-onlies engaged at these multiples... which are not worrisome for a services company like the one AAPL continues to become, notwithstanding the loss of GOOGL’s TAC fee."

Still, for a stock that owes its last 50% in price upside to the euphoric post CCDC 2024 meltup, when the narrative emerged that AAPL would capitalize on the AI boom, only to find itself in a dismal position with virtually zero uptake, the downside for the company could be substantial if the market finally starts demanding some returns on the what is now becoming a very long AI hype cycle for the world's most valuable smartphone company with virtually no IRR to show for it.

Even Bloomberg admits that it’s undeniable that Apple is in a bit of a troubled period. While rivals are thriving in artificial intelligence, Apple is a clear laggard with an inferior product that has missed the boat in the age of ChatGPT, Gemini and, now, DeepSeek. While Apple Intelligence was meant to help sell iPhones, it’s likely that the year-over-year bump we may see today in revenue is stemming from other changes -- like slightly bigger screens and new camera features -- as well as pent-up demand. The AI features have rolled out slowly and are thus far not much more than a marketing gimmick.

In any case, Apple is set to report its holiday quarter earnings results, which naturally is the most important period of the year, given that the company sees most of its sales over the holidays and saves its major new products for release during the quarter. Wall Street, matching Apple’s forecast from last fall, expects Apple’s sales to increase about 4% on an annual basis as the company reports its strongest results ever. As we previewed earlier, analysts estimate Apple will report $124 billion in revenue and its best iPhone quarter since 2022. Here are the average estimates compiled by Bloomberg for the major categories:

  • iPhone revenue: $71 billion
  • iPad revenue: $7.35 billion
  • Mac revenue: $7.94 billion
  • Wearables, Home and Accessories revenue: $12 billion
  • Services revenue: $26.1 billion

If these numbers hold, that would mean Apple is looking at a clean sweep of growth annually in all of its product categories.

So how did AAPL do? Well, as many warned, the two weakest links - namely iPhone sales and China - is precisely what Apple disappointed. Here are the details:

  • Adjusted EPS $2.40 vs. $2.18 y/y, beating estimate $2.35
    • Revenue $124.30 billion, +4% y/y, beating estimates $124.1 billion
      • Products revenue $97.96 billion, +1.6% y/y, missing estimates of $98.02 billion
      • IPhone revenue $69.14 billion, -0.8% y/y, badly missing estimates of $71.04 billion
      • Mac revenue $8.99 billion, +16% y/y, beating estimates of $7.94 billion
      • IPad revenue $8.09 billion, +15% y/y, beating estimates of $7.35 billion
      • Wearables, home and accessories $11.75 billion, -1.7% y/y, missing estimates of $11.95 billion
  • Service revenue $26.34 billion, +14% y/y, beating estimates of $26.1 billion

The one - very big - fly in the ointment was the usual suspect: China, where revenues unexpectedly tumbled, sliding a whopping 11%, and badly missing estimates of a $21.57BN print

  • Greater China rev. $18.51 billion, -11% y/y, estimate $21.57 billion

Going down the line:

  • Total operating expenses $15.44 billion, +6.6% y/y, above estimates of $15.34 billion
  • Cost of sales $66.03 billion, +2% y/y, above estimates of $65.98 billion
  • Gross margin $58.28 billion, +6.2% y/y, above estimates of $57.98 billion
  • Cash and cash equivalents $30.30 billion, -26% y/y, below estimates of $36.45 billion

And so on:

Looking at a breakdown of sales by product category it goes from bad to worse, because not only did revenue from the iPhone came in much lower than expected, at $69.1 billion, below estimates of $71.0 billion but it was actually down 1.4% YoY. So much for any hopes of an AI supercycle.

The rest of the product suite was mixed with Mac and iPad revenue coming in above estimates while wearables missed. Here are the details: .

  • IPhone revenue $69.14 billion, down 0.8% y/y, and missing estimate $71.04 billion
  • Mac revenue $8.99 billion, +16% y/y, beating estimates of $7.94 billion
  • IPad revenue $8.09 billion, +15% y/y, also beating estimates of $7.35 billion
  • Wearables, Home and Accessories was another disappointment, declining considerably and missing Wall Street expectations, wit: 11.75 billion, down 1.7% y/y, and missing estimate $11.95 billion

Bottom line, there simply is not a lot of excitement in Apple’s wearables segment right now where we already know the Vision Pro has been a huge flop and is doing nothing to help the top line, while Apple only released one new Apple Watch (versus its usual two or three) during the quarter. The new low-end AirPods and hearing features for the AirPods Pro are quite compelling technology-wise, but clearly not commercially enough to grow the overall category.

Here is the full revenue breakdown by product:

But if soft iPhone sales news was bad, the devastation that is China sales was catastrophic: contrary to expectations for a modest rebound, China sales declined for a sixth consecutive quarter, down a whopping 11.1%, and printing at only $18.5BN in what is supposed to be the strongest quarter, below the $21.6BN estimate. The rest of the world saw growth, modest in the Americas at 3.9%, and stronger in Europe and APAC, both double digits.

Greater China continues to be a very weak spot for Apple and the company hasn’t done much to push new products, pricing and initiatives in that market -- or other emerging areas -- to offset the issues.

The weakness there, which Apple will try to explain away in its conference call, is because of a combination of nationalism and interest in local products, whose designs are getting better. The local players are also trying new things like foldables while Apple continues to use the same design it rolled out five years ago.

The result: revenues declining now for an unprecedented 5 quarters!

There was a slight silver lining in the company's Service revenue, which after missing last quarter, come in stronger than expected, rising to a new record $26.34 billion, 14% YoY and above the $26.1 billion expected. The question is what will happen once this last saving grace flatlines or, worse, starts contracting.

In the press release, CEO Tim Cook tried hard to stay positive, calling it the company’s “best quarter ever.”

“Today Apple is reporting our best quarter ever, with revenue of $124.3 billion, up 4 percent from a year ago. We were thrilled to bring customers our best-ever lineup of products and services during the holiday season. Through the power of Apple silicon, we’re unlocking new possibilities for our users with Apple Intelligence, which makes apps and experiences even better and more personal. And we’re excited that Apple Intelligence will be available in even more languages this April.”

And while Cook said the iPhone reached an all-time revenue record in dozens of markets and regions, the reality is that, sales declined and missed Wall Street expectations.

New CFO Kevan Parekh also got his first quote:

“Our record revenue and strong operating margins drove EPS to a new all-time record with double-digit growth and allowed us to return over $30 billion to shareholders. We are also pleased that our installed base of active devices has reached a new all-time high across all products and geographic segments.”

Elsewhere, Apple’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per share of the Company’s common stock. Translation: no $50 billion stock buyback announcement this quarter. .

Yet despite management's valiant attempt to put lipstick on this particular pig, investors would have none of it and after an early headfake after hours which briefly sent the stock as high as $245, AAPL is now at session lows, dropping to $234 and falling.

 

Tyler Durden Thu, 01/30/2025 - 17:00
https://ift.tt/gQeN5fP
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/gQeN5fP
via IFTTT

Apple Slides After iPhone Sales Miss, China Revenues Unexpectedly Tumble SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Mexico - Friend, Enemy, Neutral, Or Something Else?

Authored by Victor Davis Hanson via American Greatness,

Mexican nationals, likely cartel members, recently crossed the border and shot and wounded an American hiker. Did they assume that Joe Biden was still president, and so it was still a veritable open season on Americans without consequences?

Mexico also recently balked at allowing a U.S. transport plane to land, returning its own nationals apprehended as illegal aliens.

Was its attitude that Alejandro Mayorkas was still Homeland Security Secretary and thus working with Mexico to ensure that millions of illegal aliens could stay in the U.S. indefinitely?

After four years of Biden’s appeasement, Mexico seems to assume that it has a sovereign right to encourage the flight of millions of its own impoverished citizens illegally into the U.S. and further assumes that it can fast-track millions of Latin Americans through its territory and across our border.

Mexico either cannot or will not address the billions of dollars of raw fentanyl products shipped in—mostly from China—and then processed for export to the U.S. by its cartels across a nonexistent border.

Mexico seems to have little concern that some 75,000 Americans on average die from mostly Mexican-imported fentanyl each year—more deaths in just the last decade than all the Americans killed in action during World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War combined. Who then is our friend, and who is our enemy?

This appalling death toll is in part due to the deliberate efforts of the cartels to mask fentanyl as less deadly narcotics or camouflage the poison by lacing it into counterfeit prescription drugs.

Mexico encourages its expatriate illegal aliens to send back some $63 billion per year in remittances. That huge sum constitutes one of Mexico’s largest sources of foreign exchange, surpassing even its tourist and oil revenues.

These billions are often subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. America’s local, state, and federal governments provide billions of dollars in food, housing, and health care entitlements that allow Mexico’s citizens, illegally residing inside the U.S., to free up the cash to be sent home.

According to U.S. census data, almost every year, the trade deficit with Mexico has increased from about $50 billion twenty years ago to $160 billion today.

That astronomical figure neither includes the $63 billion American outflow in remittances nor the multi-billion income from the cartels’ illicit drug sales in the U.S.

Although one would never know it from the rhetoric of Mexican politicians, the entire Mexican economy, both legal and illicit, hinges on America accepting a worsening asymmetrical relationship.

Yet the U.S. has a lot of leverage with Mexico to ensure that it no longer assumes a permanent huge trade surplus with the U.S., turns a blind eye to massive fentanyl shipments that kill thousands of Americans, encourages its own citizens to enter their neighbor’s country illegally, and counts on massive cash remittances from the U.S.

Loud rhetoric, threats, and ultimatums do not work.

Usually, they earn Mexico’s furious retorts about Yanqui imperialism and ancient bitterness about a lost Aztlán.

Former Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador used to brag about the millions of illegal aliens that were residing in the U.S. He further advised expatriate Mexican-Americans not to vote for Republicans, whom he felt one day might close the border.

Obrador rarely reflected on why millions of his own citizens were fleeing his own country—only that it was a “beautiful” thing that they did.

Did Obrador hate Trump more for challenging him by trying to stop the illegal influx or Biden for embarrassing him by welcoming millions of them into the U.S.?

So, what should be the U.S. response to Mexico’s passive-aggressive policies?

Smile, praise Mexico as our greatest trading partner, and then quietly inform them that illegal aliens will be bussed to the border.

Once there, they could be given a generous care package, escorted through a border door, and left on the Mexican side from which they entered and thus could then be escorted in caravans home in the same manner that they arrived.

To maintain cordial relations and politely gain Mexico’s attention, we need a radical change in tone and action beyond just ending catch-and-release, finishing the wall, and making refugee status requests possible only in the home country of the applicant.

Rather than worry about who is sending remittances, why not politely place a 20 percent tax (about $12 billion) on all cash sent from the U.S. to Mexico?

We could also hail our mutual friendship and then reluctantly slap tariffs on imported assembled goods until the two-way trade is roughly balanced.

Who knows, once the U.S. is respected again and not considered an easy mark, Mexico could once again become a fine and reciprocal friend to the United States.

Tyler Durden Thu, 01/30/2025 - 16:20
https://ift.tt/H0bRWD8
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/H0bRWD8
via IFTTT

Mexico - Friend, Enemy, Neutral, Or Something Else? SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

MSFT Tumbles On Cloud Revenue Miss

Having suffered this week from ChatCCP's arrival on the scene, traders are hoping that MSFT's earnings (and CapEx outlook) will rescue sentiment. If ASML's data is anything to go by, thing should be positive.

Out of the gate, MSFT beat expectations top- and bottom-line...

  • *MICROSOFT 2Q REV. $69.63B, EST. $68.92B

  • *MICROSOFT 2Q EPS $3.23, EST. $3.10

But, below the surface things were more problematic as Cloud Revenue disappointed:

  • *MICROSOFT 2Q CLOUD REV. $40.9B, EST. $41.1B

  • *MICROSOFT 2Q INTELLIGENT CLOUD REV. $25.54B, EST. $25.89B

Azure revenue growth slowed to 31.0% (below the 31.8% expected) and the slowest in a year...

“This quarter Microsoft Cloud revenue was $40.9 billion, up 21% year-over-year,” said Amy Hood, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Microsoft.

”We remain committed to balancing operational discipline with continued investments in our cloud and AI infrastructure.”

The reaction was not good with MSFT down over 5% in the after hours (having rallied up to erase the losses from DeepSeek Day beforehand)...

“We are innovating across our tech stack and helping customers unlock the full ROI of AI to capture the massive opportunity ahead," said Satya Nadella, chairman and chief executive officer of Microsoft.

“Already, our AI business has surpassed an annual revenue run rate of $13 billion, up 175% year-over-year.”

We look forward to hearing the questiohns about DeepSeek during the earnings call.

Tyler Durden Wed, 01/29/2025 - 16:10
https://ift.tt/7LsAmbB
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/7LsAmbB
via IFTTT

MSFT Tumbles On Cloud Revenue Miss SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Grand DOJ Purge Continues: Acting AG Mass-Fires Lawyers Who Prosecuted Trump

It's often said that "elections have consequences." More than a dozen Department of Justice lawyers can testify that truth, having been mass-fired by the Trump administration on Monday over their participation in pressing two federal criminal cases against Trump. 

“Acting Attorney General James McHenry made this decision because he did not believe these officials could be trusted to faithfully implement the President’s agenda because of their significant role in prosecuting the President,” an anonymous DOJ official told Politico, declining to name the newly-departed. All of them worked under special counsel Jack Smith, who resigned earlier this month, knowing Trump had promised to terminate him. 

Acting Attorney General James McHenry, who dropped the axe on Trump's prosecutors, previously held immigration-focused roles at DOJ (
Reuters
/Allison Shelley)  

The fired lawyers found out via electronic messages sent from McHenry on Monday afternoon. Instead of telling the lawyers they'd been terminated for cause, the notices pointed to Trump's constitutional power over personnel under Article III. At the same time, however, McHenry did cite a "cause": 

“Given your significant role in prosecuting the president, I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implementing the president’s agenda faithfully.” 

Under special counsel Smith, the lawyers fired on Monday brought charges against Trump for alleged unlawful retention of classified documents and alleged interference with the transfer of presidential power following the 2020 election. The documents case was nixed by a judge who said Smith's appointment was illegal. Smith himself asked a court to withdraw the transfer-of-power case after Trump won in November. 

The firings drew howls from Trump foes, including Obama ethics counsel Norm Eisen, who said the firings are illegal in light of legal protections for career federal workers. “These are spurious terminations. The grounds are a hodgepodge of disinformation and distortion of facts and law,” he told Politico. "This will almost certainly trigger litigation and likely will be met with extreme judicial skepticism.” The termination messages informed recipients, that they may have a right to file an appeal with the US Merit Systems Protection Board within 30 days. Some observers contend that the termination notices themselves will lend strength to any appeals: 

The dumping of Trump's persecutors was just the latest step in a broader, post-election purge at DOJ. Last week, multiple top officials at DOJ's Executive Office of Immigration Review, which oversees the country’s immigration courts, were pointed to the door. Nearly two dozen more were reassigned. 

Acting AG McHenry is keeping DOJ's top chair warm for Trump nominee Pam Bondi, who merrily pummeled Democrats in her Jan. 15 confirmation hearing. Drawing a contrast with what the country witnessed during Biden's term, Bondi vowed that "no one will be prosecuted [or] investigated because they are a political opponent.” Her next step is a vote by the Senate Judiciary Committee which has yet to be scheduled.

Pam Bondi, Trump's nominee for US attorney general, at her Senate confirmation hearing 

Meanwhile, DOJ employees are feeling like they're on the wrong end of a shock-and-awe campaign. “It feels like a non-violent war. It’s just wild," one career DOJ employee told Politico“People are just in a state of shock and devastated. It’s unlike anything I’ve ever seen … Nothing that happened during the first Trump administration came anywhere close to this.”

Looking at the wreckage, one former DOJ official summed up the picture like this:

“It’s got to be among the most demoralizing moments in the history of the Department of Justice. It is a flat-out purge of individuals who this administration must view either of suspect loyalty or have worked on matters they just did not like. We are in the early phases of what to me is just looking like a wholesale, politically-inspired demolition of the Department of Justice in key places.”

The former official surely didn't intend for it to sound so wonderful.

Tyler Durden Tue, 01/28/2025 - 15:45
https://ift.tt/Z6M8PyC
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Z6M8PyC
via IFTTT

Grand DOJ Purge Continues: Acting AG Mass-Fires Lawyers Who Prosecuted Trump SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

7 Charged In America's Biggest COVID Tax Credit Fraud Scheme

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A group of seven who allegedly sought to steal hundreds of millions of dollars in the “largest COVID-19 tax credit scheme” by falsely claiming pandemic-era benefits were charged on Jan. 22, according to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

The Department of Justice in Washington on Jan. 9, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

An indictment unsealed in New York charged the seven people with “operating a multi-state conspiracy in which they attempted to defraud the United States of more than $600 million by filing more than 8,000 false tax returns claiming COVID-19-related employment tax credits,” the agency said in a statement. The fraud targeted programs like employee retention credit (ERC) and paid sick and family leave credit (SFLC), which were passed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The ERC gave tax credits to businesses, incentivizing them to keep employees on their payroll, while SFLC was a reimbursement made to businesses for paying employees “on sick or family leave and could not work because of COVID-19.”

The charges were made against Keith Williams, Jamari Lewis, Morais Dicks, Janine Davis, Tiffany Williams, James Hames Jr., and Ewendra Mathurin; all of whom are either current or former residents of New York.

Between November 2021 and June 2023, the defendants “repeatedly exploited” ERC and SFLC programs, the DOJ said. “The scheme was allegedly headquartered at Credit Reset, a purported credit repair business Keith Williams owned and operated.”

The defendants acted as tax preparers and allegedly filed over 8,000 fake employment tax returns on behalf of themselves and clients, claiming COVID tax credits from the IRS. In some of the fake returns, they allegedly claimed SFLC which exceeded reported wages, according to the department.

The defendants managed to secure refund checks from the Treasury, while also profiting by charging clients a fee or percentage of the tax refunds they received, the agency accused.

“The defendants allegedly concealed their preparation of the false tax returns by not listing themselves as the paid preparer on the tax returns and by using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to obscure their IP addresses while filing the false returns,” the DOJ said.

If a client did not have a business, members of the conspiracy allegedly would sometimes sell shell companies to them in order to file false tax returns.”

The fraudsters reportedly filed for $600 million in tax credits as part of the scheme, of which the IRS roughly disbursed $45 million. Authorities charged the defendants with 45 counts, including wire fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and assisting in preparing false tax returns.

Some of the defendants also allegedly submitted false applications for loans under the pandemic-era Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). Six people allegedly involved in the PPP fraud were charged with wire fraud as well.

If convicted, defendants face prison terms ranging from three to 30 years per count, depending on the charge.

Tackling Pandemic Fraud

The DOJ had previously charged several hundreds of individuals for fraud related to COVID-19. Back in August 2023, the agency announced 718 enforcement actions for alleged COVID-19 fraud offenses involving $836 million. This included federal criminal charges against 371 defendants.

Many of the cases were linked to pandemic unemployment insurance benefit fraud, as well as fraud related to the Economic Injury Disaster Loans and PPP.

In March last year, the IRS announced that its Criminal Investigation (CI) unit had investigated 1,644 tax and money laundering cases worth $8.9 billion that were linked to COVID fraud.

The cases involved fraudulently obtained loans, payments, and credits aimed at supporting American workers and small businesses.

In the last year alone, we have opened nearly 700 new COVID fraud investigations that collectively add up to $5 billion in potential fraud,” CI Chief Guy Ficco said at the time. “Our special agents continue to seek out fraudsters who stole money from government loan programs for their personal gain.”

This month, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) announced the introduction of the “Complete COVID Collections Act” that seeks to extend authorization of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery (SIGPR) through 2030.

SIGPR, created as a watchdog to oversee loans provided under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, is scheduled to expire in March 2025. Extending the authorization allows the SIGPR to continue pursuing people who stole COVID funds reserved for small businesses, Ernst said.

“Con artists took advantage of small businesses’ pain during COVID to defraud government programs designed to help hardworking Americans,” Ernst said.

“While we are $36 trillion in debt, we especially cannot afford to leave more than $200 billion floating around, especially in the hands of fraudsters. My Republican colleagues and I are making sure that all resources are available in this fight to get taxpayers’ money back and hold these criminals accountable.”

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/27/2025 - 17:40
https://ift.tt/zoJFTgn
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/zoJFTgn
via IFTTT

7 Charged In America's Biggest COVID Tax Credit Fraud Scheme SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Glug, Glug...

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

“. . .once Trump runs out of easy ways to unfuck the federal government, his administration will hit a crossroads moment, probably sooner rather than later.”

- Matt Taibbi

Glug, Glug...

That’s the sound of a swamp being drained. And much fetid water is still backed up over the 68.3 square miles that comprise the District of Columbia. You might be just realizing that the “Joe Biden” regime was not a government at all, but rather, a colossal racketeering operation. And let’s be clear and precise: racketeering is making money dishonestly. Thus: the grubby Biden Family itself at the top of that putrid food-chain, and their smalltime harvesting of mere table-scraps. Where trillions got creamed off by the big gators, the Bidens risked all for a measly few million, like newts gorging on gnats in a drainage ditch.

Are you so cynical— as the Marxians are in their so-called “critique” of capitalism — that you think all human transactions of making-and-doing are dishonest? That is yet another misreading of reality, which the recent years of nonstop official propaganda and gaslight have catastrophically aggravated to the degree that half of America can no longer think at all.

Capitalism is not a political ideology despite the “ism” incorrectly attached to it, like the tail pinned on a donkey. Capitalism is simply the management of surplus wealth. The catch is, in a hyper-complex society, the management itself becomes complex to an extreme. And that can easily lead to mismanagement, which will deform and pervert the very mechanisms that superintend wealth, sometimes so badly that the wealth disappears altogether.

These are the dynamics faced by the newborn Trump command. Both political parties, per se, have fallen into a dismal habit of racketeering in this sclerotic state-of-empire. But now Mr. Trump has seized control of the Republican apparatus, at least, and the Party’s entrenched ol’ crocs and pythons descry that under DJT the regular feeding frenzy is over. Hence: the hand-wringing over Pete Hegseth setting foot in the Pentagon, as he will sometime this dawning day. The dollars pounded down that rat-hole in this century could have funded start-ups of several empires, but instead the swag just landed in the index funds of countless board members parasitically lodged in a dark cosmos of G.I. procurement circle-jerks. A lot of that can and will be stopped. And the ones who just won’t quit are liable to be found out.

Now, the Democratic Party faces more perplexing quandaries. It, too, is constructed as a gigantic grift machine. But if you subtract the employees of the multitudinous NGOs and non-profit orgs set up in recent years to receive government largess — which have spawned like smelts in the San Joaquin delta — you would eliminate much of the party’s rank-and-file. (The rest are apparently embedded in government itself and the teachers’ union.) A whole lot of activists would lose their platforms for activism in the process.

These crypto-bureaucracies have become the places where the Democratic Party stashes the “elite over-production” of Woked-up Marxian semi-morons from America’s diploma mills — in which orgs they are lavishly paid to conduct the aforementioned propaganda and gaslighting operations that wrecked so many American minds. The funding spigot to many of those is getting shut down. It will result in an employment crunch for a large cohort of professional crybabies. They could possibly adapt to their new circumstances by ceasing to be crybabies, and finding other, more useful things to do. That would portend some very significant cultural shiftings, which might include the death of the Democratic Party as we’ve known it. Or, they could all just join Antifa (if they’re not already in it) and go make trouble in the streets.

The first seven days of Mr. Trump have been sheer razzle-dazzle. He and the people around him have torn through the zeitgeist like front-end-loaders through a homeless encampment. He has yet to meet a crisis. Some of the obvious traps are avoidable. For instance: seeking further injury to Russia as a way of ending the stupid Ukraine war — started by us in 2014, thanks a lot Victoria Nuland & Company — since both the US and Russia are just about unconditionally desirous of stopping the damn thing as soon as possible. It’s had no benefit for anybody but the Raytheon war lobby and the Zelensky regime’s legion of grifters. Mr. Trump’s recent tough talk has been entirely for show, just a mass of rhetorical lube to un-stick the lingering “Joe Biden” stasis in that sad-sack corner of the world.

If crisis awaits, it’s probably lurking in the financial realm, where the operations of debt have put nearly every country on Gawd’s Green Earth behind the eight-ball. There is just too much of it that everybody knows can’t possibly be paid back — or soon even serviced — and the grand managers of these matters are finally out of tricks for pretending things can go on. Nor, here in America, can Mr. Trump cut spending fast enough to rebalance accounts. And if he somehow could, government employment has become such a big piece of the total economy that we would land post-haste in a new great depression That predicament is yet-to-be faced, but hold your breath because it is hard upon us.

Meanwhile, this is the week when the most hardcore of Mr. Trump’s cabinet warriors go ‘splainin’ before committees in the US Senate: Bobby Kennedy, Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and Kash Patel. Prepare for some heat and light. And then, the deluge.

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/27/2025 - 16:20
https://ift.tt/TLmvXWD
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/TLmvXWD
via IFTTT

Glug, Glug... SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Hartnett: These Are The 10 Biggest Themes In The Next 5 Years

There was a lot to unpack in Michael Hartnett's latest Flow Show, in which he detailed the just released report from BofA's thematic group analyzing "The Big 10 Themes for the Next 5 Years" (available to pro subs), and we'll get to that in a bit, but first a quick recap of his latest qualitative observations which are for the most part, a continuation of his "bond bullish" theme discussed last week, with the CIO once again underscoring that there is a potential "twin peaks" in bond yields (5% on 30-year UST)...

... but also in the US$ ...

… which he views as risk-on catalysts if gold rises above $2800/oz (just $30 away)...

... and if the NYSE can rise above 20,500.

That said, equity breadth still remains very poor (SPW/SPX & ACWX/SPX pinned to lows) but global PMIs are once again in expansion territory and rising >50

... which when coupled with potential monetary policy divergence (Fed set to hike again as the RoW cutting), would result in  better breadth.

Hartnett then looks at the latest BofA Private Client data, and finds that it maps perfectly into the Fed’s quarterly estimate for US household equity net worth ($55.7tn in 3Q24), which also reveals that US equity wealth was up $1.6tn in 4Q24, and set to gain another $1.9tn in 1Q25 (unless the market crashes).

Taking a step back, the BofA strategist reveals that the bank's high net worth clients are holding on to $3.9tn AUM, broken down into a near-record 63.2% in stocks, 18.8% in bonds, and 11.2% cash...

 

... where Hartnett urges readers to note the contrast in position in "Magnificent 7" stocks ($430bn) vs. gold ($9bn); Another highlights: BofA's private clients have been big bond buyers past 2 weeks (biggest since Jul’24), and remain buyers of stocks ($13bn since election, biggest 2-month add since 2022), while in ETFs, private clients buying bank loans, staples, discretionary, selling low-volatility, healthcare, resources past 4 weeks.

Ok, but if the high net worth client list is already near record stock capacity, do they have the capacity to buy more? Well, looking at the source of funds - for future stock buying - Hartnett makes the following observations:

Conventional wisdom is money market fund asset AUM, which is at a record $6.9tn...

... will be a big 2025 source of funds for risk assets; But Hartnett warns that conventional wisdom will likely be disappointed as history shows MMFA inflows continue for 9 months after 1st Fed cut for 9 months, i.e. peak MMFA AUM will hit in June ’25, and the past 2 cycles of big Fed easing in '09 & '20 saw sharp drop in MMFA/cash but bonds & gold were big beneficiaries (bear markets & recession are when cash rates are slashed).

Turning to "unconventional wisdom", Hartnett notes that housing is a source of funds for both stocks & crypto, and especially now for the following reason: the US housing affordability index is hovering at 40-year lows, US home price-to-rent ratio close to all-time highs...

... which has pushed the median age of the US first-time homebuyer to a  record-high 38 years old (was 29 years in 1985); As a result of this housing unaffordability, the millennial & Gen Z “can’t-buy-a-home” liquidity recycled into risk assets.

All of this leads to a virtuous cycle: since the US economy has become "exceptionally" sensitive to asset prices in the post QE/financial crisis era ... 

... the higher equity net worth means more wealth that either supports consumption or is recycled into risk assets; for context, US household equity net worth is $55.7tn in 3Q24; and while the Fed has yet to release 4Q24 data (due in March) as noted above the BofA private client equity holdings data maps perfectly into Fed estimate of US household equity net worth, and it reveals equity wealth rose $1.6tn in 4Q24, and is set to gain another $1.9tn in 1Q25, which makes the stock market a self-fulfilling catalyst for “US exceptionalism".

Which then brings us to the punchline of the latest Flow Show: Hartnett recaps of the latest must read BofA thematic research report, looking at the "World In 2030" (full note available to pro subscribers), and specifically what the bank thinks will be the 10 biggest themes in the next 5 years.

We excerpt from the full must-read report:

1. "Technology is eating the world": Agentic AI + Reasoning + Rich Simulations + Embodied AI = Industry 6.0 which is minimizing human intervention.

Summary: Technology is moving us to a new phase in the next 5 years. Powered by the AI revolution, we will watch technology prices plummet. We will see AI’s integration in all aspects of our lives. We will witness its game-changing role in leap-frogging innovation. Agentic AI will influence the job market, rich AI simulations will develop new products in healthcare, industrials and financial services. Furthermore, AI will interact with the physical environment, enabling the next generation of automation. At the same time, we are likely to see a tech war “arms race” between the Superpowers, complicated by accelerated deglobalization and tech protectionism, as well as privacy and demographic concerns.

Welcome to Industry 6.0 – minimizing human intervention

The AI large language model (LLM) revolution has accelerated the adoption of Industry 5.0, which aimed to build on the Industry 4.0 digitalization era by integrating “humancentric” approaches into industrial processes. Industry 5.0 emphasized collaboration between humans and advanced technologies, such as AI-driven robots, to optimize workplace processes. We are now seeing AI integrated in every aspect of our economy and our lives, and “humanizing” automated processes. This is moving us from the humanization era (Industry 5.0) to Industry 6.0, which aims to minimize human intervention by creating a fully integrated, intelligent manufacturing systems based on the next generation of technologies.

  1. Tech-onomy: Technologies powering themselves towards lower prices - Investments in automation, AI and tech are reducing prices across the board and increasing returns. For example, while drive capacity has risen by more than 20,000x in the past 20 years, the price per gigabyte has fallen by >99%. More technology gets deployed to satisfy demand, leading to falling prices. Then these technologies become cost-effective in new applications, feeding increased demand again.
  2. “Reasoning AI”: adding the human element, one step before AGI - AI model capabilities are expanding to include tasks that require reasoning. All LLMs thus far have used algorithms for tasks that can be solved with rapid thinking, with increasingly sophisticated versions owing to their emergent properties. However, the new versions of models, like OpenAI’s o1 and o3 models, can now break down complicated problems into separate tasks and hypothesis, using “reasoning” to get to a solution – like human thinking.
  3. Agentic AI: A world of 100bn AI agents working alongside us - Agentic AI is the next big trend in commercializing AI models. It is able to use reasoning capability and build upon that to choose and use the right tools to complete the tasks it is set. At our Transforming World Conference, Steve Brown gave examples such as a marketing plan or a travel booking. He described using AI agents as a way to scale an organization and transform a company’s workforce, as well as their ability to interact with other AI agents, e.g., to obtain an approval or review (e.g., legal or compliance). This doesn’t mean human workers would be completely out of the loop, in his view, but that AI agents could be partners or subordinates that work for humans.
  4. AI-enriched simulations changing industries -  AI-enriched simulations are being leveraged for other innovations; for example, simulation for drug discovery and material breakthroughs. AI has helped to discover 45x times more crystals ever known to man. Using AI in drug discovery facilitated the finding of a candidate for liver cancer in just 30 days. Many of our everyday products are complex and over time designers have come to rely on computer-driven simulations, but they often take time to run. Even once possibilities are found, additional simulations are needed to ensure safety. AI simulation combines techniques from quantum physics and deep learning to enable sampling a vast dataset quickly and efficiently. AI and simulation technologies bring the ability to take a molecular structure and simulate it billions of times, making small changes each time to see which structure is optimal. We can now do this in a matter of weeks and months – a task that would take 10 years in the physical world.
  5. Embodied AI, physical intelligence & humanoid robots - AI is enabling rapid progress in robots, given the ability to programme and interact with them via language models. The term “embodied AI” was first used to describe the branch of AI that focuses on how computers, systems and technology can interact with the physical world. It typically includes AI for sensorimotor skills, navigation, and realworld interactions. But with the rise of generative AI, embodied AI is also being used to give this technology a physical form, typically a robot including autonomous vehicles and drones. The next half a decade will be the breakthroughs years of robotics thanks to AI.
  6. Welcome to the quantum era. Quantum advantage as soon as 2025? We are currently in the early prototype phase of quantum. Scaling up a quantum computers’ qubit number involves solving for many problems such as error correction, cost, speed, and energy efficiency. Current quantum computing companies will need to solve these problems but will reach a limit on the qubit number they can achieve because of the complex architecture that they employ e.g., cabling and racks.
  7. Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)…by 2028? AI smart enough to automate AI research to improve itself, providing feedback loops where superintelligence is possible. Since the first discussions about general AI and technological singularity by mathematician Von Neumann in the mid-20th century, scientists and technologists have repeatedly predicted the coming of human-level intelligent machines in the near term. NVDA’s CEO projected we will reach AGI by 2030, while futurist Steve Brown claimed it could be sooner than that in our Transforming World Conference, that AGI is between 1 year away and never being achieved. The assumption at the moment is 2027-28, as per company/press reports.

* * *

2. Peak Monopoly: Dominance of the "Magnificent 7" peaks as AI benefits broaden & politics pressures mega-caps via taxation and regulation.

Summary: The US stock market has never been so concentrated, dominated by a handful of mega-cap companies, aka the “Magnificent 7”. However, the monopoly of capital and returns by monopolistic tech peaks in coming years as AI gains broaden to a much wider array of corporations, and populist politicians target the monopoly of megacap wealth via taxes & regulations to ease deficits and placate impact of AI on labour market.

The bigger, the better

AI has been the positive exogenous shock of the 2020s, as “Technology is eating the World” indicates. And AI has dominated investor bull psychology in the past two years encapsulated by the rise of the “Magnificent 7” (Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple,  Amazon, Google, Meta & Tesla). Even before the AI-shock, these seven companies had become the “leadership” of the US stock market driven by their first-class products, brands & management. Investors also rewarded their strong balance sheets that could withstand the rise in interest rates in the early-2020s, and their monopolistic market positions that guaranteed revenue streams and low-cost suppliers. AI has added to their lustre whether via ability to fund AI capex (Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Google spent US$62bn on capex in Q3’24), lead the provision of AI services (e.g., cloud computing), and provide the chips best suited to handle the computing required by AI (Nvidia).

The combined market cap of the Magnificent 7 has risen to US$18tn, roughly equivalent to the GDP of China, and representing 35% of the market cap of the S&P 500. The US stock market is now the most concentrated in many, many decades.

In the past two years nearly 60% of S&P 500 returns have been driven by these 7 companies (the number of companies outperforming the index has fallen to its lowest since 1998/99). In addition, the dominance of the “Magnificent 7” has caused the US to rise a record-high 67% of the global stock market capitalization and has led to big shifts in regional wealth concentration (Exhibit 26).

3. Digital Insecurity: Ending the decade with the "death" of privacy, job market disruption, 10 deepfakes for every person on the planet and cybercrime as the 3rd largest GDP in the world.

Summary: Many of us feel more anxious than ever before about technology risks given everything from cybersecurity hacks, AI agents displacing human workers, the rise of fake news and the spread of mis/disinformation through deepfakes, and social media addiction leading to loneliness. The global cost of cybercrime is expected to surge to US$15.63tn by 2029-30 (source: Statista). At the same time, an attempted deepfake attack occurs every 5 minutes (source: Onfido, Entrust). The number of deepfake videos has been doubling every 6 months since 2018 (source: Sensity, Information Matters). And deepfake damage costs are projected to reach US$40bn by 2027 (source: Deloitte). Finally, we need to reskill 1bn people by 2030, which is a third of all jobs worldwide, because of technology disruption (source: WEF, OECD).

Cybersecurity: the digital black swan for 2030? - Cybersecurity is the #1 risk in a Transforming World because of how reliant we are on technology, in our view. Most of the world managed to get through COVID lockdowns and physically social distance, but would this have been possible without access to the digital world? The rise of Generative AI now creates a new ‘threatscape’. For example, using the compute power of 10,000+ A100 Nvidia GPUs to train ChatGPT, it would take just 1 second to crack a password today (source NetSec, Hive Systems). Hacks now take an average of 277 days or about 9 months to identify and contain (source: IBM). And cybersecurity is increasingly becoming a matter of national security, with critical infrastructure more vulnerable to attacks. The costs of cybercrime are eyewatering and set to hit US$10.5tn by 2025E, making it the world’s 3rd largest ‘economy’ behind only the US and China.

4. More! Exponential growth of tech requiring more resources like infrastructure, compute, bandwidth, human capital, energy, water, skills, and data centers.

Summary: A Transforming World has transforming needs. Exponential growth of technology will require significantly more resources and infrastructure, adding to the already growing requirements from population growth. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in particular is accelerating demand for data, computing power, bandwidth and expanded infrastructure such as energy, water, commodities and data centres. Several bottlenecks are already emerging in these areas, as well as gaps in the skills and human capital required to deliver them. New technologies and solutions are needed to avoid structural deficits between 2025 and 2030.

Our Transforming World is hungry – and thirsty – for more

Exponential technology requires a lot more of…everything: Simply put, deepening technology adoption alongside population growth means we need significantly more resources to enable the productivity gains and economic growth potential from AI and future technologies. The key investment opportunities in the next 5 years include:

  • Compute: AI is set to accelerate demand for more powerful chips such as GPUs, with the TAM for AI accelerators set to treble between 2024-2030 to c.US$360bn (BofA Global Research). Manufacturing capacity and supply chains are expanding to accommodate, with an overall market opportunity of over US$1tn (McKinsey).
  • Energy: increased power generation, storage and grid connections will be required for the electrification of industry, transport and buildings, adding c.7,000 TWh of electricity demand globally by 2030 (IEA). Within that, data centres could add c.250TWh in the US alone by 2030 (McKinsey).
  • Water: cooling data centres and advanced manufacturing adds demand to already strained freshwater supplies. Global data centres consumed 309m gallons of water a day on average in 2023, projected to rise to 468m by 2030 (Bluefield Research).
  • Metals: increased demand for critical minerals from AI, renewable energy and electric vehicles is expected to lead to structural shortages of several metals by 2030, including copper, nickel, lithium, cobalt and silver. Trade tensions are already increasing, such as China’s recent ban on exports of gallium and germanium – both required in semiconductor chip manufacturing (BofA Global Research).
  • Bandwidth: rising AI/tech adoption will stress internet infrastructure, requiring more fibre and advanced networks such as 5G, and beyond (6G, plus new satellitebased networks). In the US, the largest network provider, Verizon, said network traffic doubled between 2020-24, and it predicts it will double again between 2025 and 2030 owing to demand from AI tools (Bloomberg/Verizon).
  • Skills: shortages in skilled labour, e.g., in AI, data science and hardware engineering, could worsen in the next 5 years; 1bn people are set to retrain/reskill by 2030 owing to tech disruption (OECD).
  • Real Estate: more land will be needed to accommodate growing technology requirements. Per Bloomberg >7,000 public data centres are either built or in development, but more will be needed – ABI research forecasts 8,400 will be in operation by 2030 (vs 5,700 in 2024, and 3,600 in 2015).

5. Rebuilding Everything: US$94tn of funding needed by 2040 to rebuild ageing assets and expand the infrastructure supporting tech.

Summary: Global Infrastructure needs to be expanded and modernised to accommodate converging demographic, sustainability and innovation trends. But there’s a funding gap – US$94tn is required globally by 2040 (source: Oxford Economics), and an estimated US$500bn is needed each year by 2030 on top of available public funds (source: Brookfield). This spans several structural trends - including decarbonisation, electrification, disruptive technologies, reshoring, shifting demographics and ageing of existing assets – all requiring a significant increase in infrastructure investment.

The long and winding road to nextgen infrastructure - The relationship between technology, economic growth and infrastructure is closely tied to both expansion and modernisation requirements.

Addition: Expanding infrastructure to support digital technologies and several structural trends, including data centres, high-speed data networks, and energy installations to power them.

Rebuilding ageing assets: Older infrastructure such as power grids, water systems and transport networks require replacement and modernisation to integrate new technologies such as IOT/sensors, AI monitoring and intervention.

Energy transition: towards a decarbonised, decentralised, digital energy system The global energy system is transitioning towards more diversified sources of power generation and storage, which requires significant infrastructure and technology. Global investment trends are beginning to reflect this, with close to US$2tn invested in a range of clean energy assets in 2023 (double that of 2020). However, much more is needed. BNEF projects investment needs will rise to US$3tn per year based on current technologies/policies on average over 2023-30, and could reach US$5tn on average per year if further policies were instated. Power generation, EVs and grids made up c.90% of this investment in 2023, but the range of sectors is diversifying to clean industry (steel, ammonia, bioplastics), storage and electrified heat, for example

6. The End of "Anything But Bonds": Self-driven or market-imposed, era of government fiscal excess ends, reversing the primal "Anything but Bonds" theme in asset markets.

Summary: The end of 5,000-year lows in interest rates, fiscal excess, inflation....the "Anything but Bonds" trade has been the most powerful Wall St trend of the past 5 years; in the next 5 years either self-driven or market-imposed, we believe the era of government fiscal excess ends, reversing “Anything but Bonds” pricing in asset markets.

Big Government, Big Debt, Big Bond Bear

Big government has been one of the biggest themes of the 2020s. Central banks dominated economic policy making for much of the past 30 years. Fiscal policy was secondary. Asset prices in the 2010s were particularly driven by extreme monetary policies such as Quantitative Easing, Zero Interest Rates, Negative Interest Rates. By the start of the 2020s, interest rates had fallen to 5000-year lows. This has changed dramatically in recent years as a global pandemic, wars, and fiscal excess ended the 40-year long bond bull market (1981-2020). Now both governments and central banks share responsibility for economic growth.

The US federal budget deficit has averaged 9% of GDP in the past 5 years, the 2020s, with the past two administrations running the largest deficits since FDR in the '30s/'40s. The US$7tn US government sector is now the 3rd largest economy in the world in GDP terms. Big government has aided and abetted big nominal GDP growth (up almost 50% in past 5 years). The trend is global. Governments running budget surpluses have become rare…last time China ran a budget surplus was 2007, US 2001, Japan 1992, France 1974, Italy 1905.

7. Populism: "incumbents" were voted out in 26 of 32 elections in '24…populism means less globalization, immigration, and central bank independence.

Summary: Populism is politically very popular in the 2020s; populist policies in coming years mean less globalization, less immigration, less central bank independence, and fiscal policy divergence between the US (less government spending) & Europe (more government spending).

A global political theme - Populism is politically on the rise in the 2020s. Occupy Wall Street, Brexit, Trump 1.0 were all harbingers in the 2010s, and the political trend has deepened in the 2020s. Electorates are increasingly shunning mainstream political leaders and parties in response to rising inflation, rising immigration, and rising inequality (the asset prices on Wall St are 6.7x the size of the GDP of Main St – Exhibit 68).

In 2024, elections were held in countries that accounted for 40% of the world's population, 60% of world GDP, and 80% of the world's equity market cap. Trump's sweep in the US Presidential election was the most consequential populist victory, but voters notably ousted “incumbents” in 26 of the 32 elections in 2024, a year that saw the share of votes won by mainstream parties fall to its lowest in the UK since 1918 in (57%), to its lowest level in France since 1945 (36% - Exhibit 69). The German election on February 23rd looks set to be the next populist milestone. The German economy has been stagnant for 10 years, and "far-left" and "far-right" parties have recently attracted over 40% of regional election votes.

8. War & Peace: Protectionism to continue; but "forever wars" set to end & America First policies to spur Asian & European stimulus & reform.

Summary: Global trade & tech protectionism is set to continue; for Trump, tariffs address “unfair trade practices”, raise US import duty revenues, achieve non-trade objectives; but the US “forever wars” are set to end to the benefit of Europe; and America First policies will spur Asian & European stimulus & reform.

The End of Globalization

The 1990-2010 era of peace and globalization has been replaced in the past 10 years by trade wars, military wars, greater geopolitical conflict. The US has become more protectionist, and the 2018-2019 trade war resulted in the largest rise in % of US duties collected since 1930 and Smoot-Hawley (Exhibit 74). And the US-China battle for economic, technological, geopolitical supremacy has disrupted global supply chains, causing China to shift its exports to the rest of the world, away from the US, EU, Japan - Exhibit 75), and giving birth to the early-2020s theme of reshoring.

9. Rise of the Zoomers…and Boomers! US Boomers' net wealth = c.80% of world GDP. In 2030, over-65s and Gen Zs could spend c.US$28tn combined.

Summary: Over the next 10 years, we expect increased consumer spending, particularly from Gen Zs and the ageing Boomer population. Why?

  • Boomers have amassed significant wealth that they will unwind during their retirement. As an example, US Boomers have built US$82tn in net worth as of 2024 Q3 (source: Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances and Financial Accounts of the US). Globally, over-65s are projected to spend almost US$15tn a year by 2030, up from US$8.7tn in 2020 (source: Ageing Analytics Agency; Brookings).
  • Younger generations will benefit from the Great Wealth Transfer in the coming decades. Some US$84tn could be transferred to them from older generations by 2045 (source: Cerulli Associates).
  • Gen Zs will continue to represent the largest cohort of the global population over the next 10 years at c.30% (source: BofA Global Research, United Nations). Their global income levels are set to be the largest of all generations, increasing from US$9tn in 2023 to US$36tn in 2030E and US$74tn in 2040E (source: BofA Global Research, Euromonitor). This generation could also see the largest increase in spend of US$2.7tn between 2024 and 2030, reaching US$12.6tn (source: BofA Global Research, World Data Lab, Generations Forecasts, UN).

With large wealth and spending levels over the next 10 years, the consumption patterns of Gen Zs and ageing Boomers will have a strong influence on the global economy. Gen Z’s preferences are shifting away from the old economy towards tech-compatibility, sustainability, and New Media. And an ageing population entails greater spend on healthcare, aged care, leisure and financials.

10. Health The New Wealth: 10mn global health worker shortage by 2030. Ageing population stretching resources. Solution - Infusion of technology in biology.

Summary: We believe healthcare is one of the industries set to be most impacted by AI over the next 5 years. AI drug discovery could shorten the time for R&D development from decades to weeks. And AI agents could fill the 10mn global health worker shortage expected by 2030 (source: WHO). However, it’s not just AI transforming healthcare but also demographic trends, with the focus on wellness. It is now a larger market than many other major industries including the green economy, IT, sports, and pharmaceuticals. Worth US$6.3tn today, wellness is 4x larger than the global pharmaceutical industry (US$1.6tn) and 30% larger than the green economy (US$4.8tn). GLP-1 will likely be a key ‘lifestyle’ enabler. By 2030, more Americans will have tried GLP-1 than the entire Canadian population today. Beyond treating obesity, we see many other sectors indirectly being impacted (consumer staples, food retailers, restaurants, apparel retail, gambling, alcohol, tobacco, senior living).

Finally, here is a snapshot of the biggest beneficiaries of the 10 themes over the next 5 years.

Much more in the full "The World in 2030" report (available to pro subscribers), and the full Flow Show (also available to pro subscribers).

Tyler Durden Sun, 01/26/2025 - 17:11
https://ift.tt/a3x1boN
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/a3x1boN
via IFTTT

Hartnett: These Are The 10 Biggest Themes In The Next 5 Years SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend