| 0 comments ]

Have You Said "Thankyou" Once?

By Benjamin Picton, senior macro strategist at rabobank

US equities tanked yesterday in their most savage one-day selloff since the early days of Covid in 2020. The NASDAQ was hardest hit, down 5.97%, while the S&P500 and DOW gave up 4.84% and 3.98% respectively. European stocks were also savaged. The CAC40 fell 3.31% and the DAX was down 3.01%. The sharp fall in stock prices leaves US equities well in the red for the year to date, while European equities remain in the black. When asked about the market moves President Trump said: “It is to be expected, this is a patient that was very sick. We inherited a terrible economy.”

Bonds rallied across the board yesterday with US 10-year yields falling by 10bps and 2-year yields dropping by 18bps to cause a dramatic bull-steepening of the Treasury curve. The OIS implied path of the Fed Funds Rate now has four further 25bp cuts priced in by January 2026, compared to three at this time on Wednesday.

Gold prices continued to moderate after hitting fresh all-time-highs of $3,166/oz yesterday, and Brent crude is down 6.42% to $70.14/bbl as markets surmise that sweeping US tariffs spell doom for prospects of global growth. Bitcoin - perhaps the best barometer of pure financial risk - sank by almost 4% to be trading just over $82k.

Of course, the price action over the last 24 hours is all about the ‘Liberation Day’ tariff announcements made on Wednesday. Critics are complaining that the method used by the United States to determine trade barriers faced by US producers is simplistic and doesn’t reflect reality. The Administration counters that everyone else has had plenty of time to address trade imbalances and that the duties that are now being imposed are actually the “kind tariffs”. Have you said “thankyou” once?

The United States pursuing US policy goals to the detriment of friend and foe alike has set off outrage around the world. Emmanuel Macron called for a halt on investment into the United States and Ursula von der Leyen said that the EU will first seek to negotiate down the tariffs, but if that fails the EU will impose “countermeasures” and seek to protect its own industry from cheap goods being dumped into the European market by others (read, China). Limitations have already been enacted on imports of duty-free steel.

Von der Leyen said that she “agree[s] with President Trump that others are taking unfair advantage of the current rules”, but she seems to think that the Americans shouldn’t have done anything about it, and should have opted instead for another round fruitless talks. Presumably, ‘others’ does not include the EU in von der Leyen’s eyes, but try selling agricultural products into the European market from abroad and see how far you get.

China has also vowed retaliation. Trump hit China with a 34% reciprocal tariff rate that will stack on top of the 20% tariffs that are already in place. This is a big problem for China, because their economic model is based on subsidising (over)production and then exporting the surplus into the world’s biggest consumer market: the USA. Europe is now understandably terrified that China’s exportable surplus, having been effectively barred from the USA, is going to end up in their market and add to the existing woes of European manufacturers.

The PBOC allowed the CNY to drift lower yesterday to offset some of the pain of the new tariffs. Could we see more currency weakness to come? And would that incur another step up in tariffs from the USA if it were to happen? You can see how a path is being laid for tit-for-tat trade strikes that could all but close bilateral trade between the world’s two largest economies. That will really be curtains for globalization.

The reaction has been different in the antipodes. Australia and New Zealand are grumbling about their exports (principally beef, wine, dairy and sheepmeat) now being subject to a 10% tariff, but there seems to be a grudging acceptance that the outcome could have been worse and that product will still flow into the US market, albeit at less attractive prices than might have been the case otherwise.

The ‘best response’ being countenanced by Australia and New Zealand is to do nothing, because retaliation would likely achieve nothing aside from antagonizing their security guarantor and pushing up prices for consumers. The US has enormous leverage over both countries by virtue of not only their dependence on the US Navy, but the dependence of their banking sector on US capital markets for funding. Close that funding channel down and watch the richly-valued housing markets in both countries implode and take their economies down with it.

Aussie and Kiwi OIS curves are now implying more rate cuts (4.5 in Australia and 4 in New Zealand), but the US administration might take a dim view of any devaluation of the AUD or NZD that results from more aggressive monetary policing easing. Currency manipulation is on the USA’s list of grievances, but so long as devaluation doesn’t result in a structural trade surplus with the USA it may not be a problem, especially since the USA would like Australia and New Zealand to help it contain Chinese ambitions in the South Pacific.

Conspicuous among the tariff rates announced by President Trump was the low numbers for many South American economies. This appears to be further evidence of a reinvigoration of the Monroe Doctrine in US foreign policy designed to pull Latin America deeper into the USA’s economic orbit. Relatedly, Marco Rubio recently met with his counterpart from Argentina to discuss trade and security ties aimed at countering Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, and the Pentagon just announced a series of arms sales to Ecuador.

Rubio has also been speaking with counterparts in Europe, who he says need to plot a trajectory towards increasing defence spending to 5% of GDP(!). He assured Europeans that the United States remains committed to NATO, and suggested that the USA would need to increase its own spending on defense. That seems sensible given the geostrategic challenges that the United States faces, but it is also at odds with Trump’s previous direction to Pete Hegseth to find ways to reduce defence spending by 8% each year.

So, while in many respects the US policy renovation of recent days is a throwback to past ways of doing things, the policies being embraced pre-date the institutional settlement that has mostly prevailed since the end of WWII. The Washington Consensus appears to be on its last legs and the policy goal of “GDP for GDP’s sake” is being replaced by “GDP for the sake of state aims”. Making America great again entails a shift from a consumption-driven economy to a production-driven economy. The logical corollary here is that American living standards are going to have to be lower as consumption is taxed (via tariffs) to provide an implicit subsidy to domestic producers. There are winners and losers in this process, but overall this is unlikely to be bullish for American living standards in the short run, especially if your living standards are derived from the financialized economy that has been the ‘winner’ from the policy framework of the last 45 years.

Unnamed Senior White House officials are now being quoted as saying that the post-World War Two institutions are “no longer fit for our times and our economic situation”. If there was any doubt before that Trump meant what he said when he claimed “the future does not belong to globalists, the future belongs to patriots”, there can be no doubt now.

Tyler Durden Fri, 04/04/2025 - 15:40
https://ift.tt/wkreciq
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wkreciq
via IFTTT

Have You Said "Thankyou" Once? SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Pentagon Watchdog Launches Investigation Into SecDef Hegseth Over Use Of Signal

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

The inspector general for the Department of Defense is investigating Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over his use of the messaging app Signal.

Acting Pentagon Inspector General Steven A. Stebbins said in an April 3 memorandum to Hegseth that the probe would cover whether Hegseth and other military personnel complied with Department of Defense policies and procedures for using a commercial messaging application for official business.

“Additionally, we will review compliance with classification and records retention requirements,” he said.

A Department of Defense spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email, “Per our longstanding policy, we don’t comment on ongoing investigations.”

Hegseth has not reacted as of yet to the development.

Hegseth and other top U.S. officials in mid-March messaged on Signal about strikes in Yemen against Houthi terrorists.

The Atlantic released the messages after Jeffrey Goldberg, its editor-in-chief, was added to the chat group.

Hegseth and the White House have said no classified information was shared.

Developing...

Tyler Durden Thu, 04/03/2025 - 17:00
https://ift.tt/PdQRFyv
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/PdQRFyv
via IFTTT

Pentagon Watchdog Launches Investigation Into SecDef Hegseth Over Use Of Signal SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Intel, TSMC Tentatively Agree On Chipmaking JV In 'America First' Era 

Intel shares are up 5% late in the cash session following a report from The Information that sheds light on ongoing talks between Intel and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) to form a joint venture to operate Intel's chipmaking facilities. Under the proposed deal, TSMC would take a 20% stake in the new company and offer manufacturing expertise and personnel training. 

Two people familiar with the talks between Intel and TSMC provided additional color about the preliminary agreement to form the new joint venture:

Intel and other U.S. semiconductor companies will hold the majority of the shares in the proposed JV, which would include at least some of Intel's existing chip foundries, said the two people. In exchange for the 20% stake, TSMC has discussed sharing some of its chipmaking methods with Intel and training Intel personnel to use them, insteading of funding its stake with capital, one of the people said.

It isn't clear how the rest of the new entity would be funded. The deliberations are ongoing and no final agreement has been reached, the two people said. There's still resistance from some Intel executives concerned that the deal would cause widespread layoffs at the company while subsuming its own chipmaking technology, according to two Intel employees.

The JV was encouraged by members of the Trump administration and is part of the broader 'America First' effort to revive the U.S. chipmaking sector after decades of decay. It also plays into hemispheric defense, where the U.S. will rely less on foreign adversaries for chips.

President Trump has previously accused Taiwan of "stealing" America's chip industry: "You know, Taiwan, they stole our chip business ... and they want protection." However, TSMC has reversed the tide with additional investments in the U.S. - more than $100 billion.

Multiple reports over the last several weeks, including this one from Reuters, have discussed TSMC pitching a JV with Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, and Broadcom to operate Intel's factories.

Sources via The Information continued:

White House and Commerce officials have been pressing TSMC and Intel to strike a deal to resolve the long-running crisis at Intel, one of the most iconic U.S. technology firms. Commerce officials who have facilitated the negotiations support the tentative deal, said the two people who have been involved in some of the talks.

. . . 

The proposed joint venture could also help TSMC effectively put down a major, if struggling, competitor and give the Taiwanese government more bargaining power with the Trump administration, which just levied tariffs on goods other than chips from the island.

In February, Robert W. Baird analysts wrote in a note to clients that the Trump administration was working to broker a JV between Intel and TSMC, one which would focus on something we said last August has excess value at the Intel enterprise, namely its fabs... 

In markets, Intel shares are up 5% in late cash trading. On the year, shares are up about 16% on speculation of a deal - shares have been floored around $20 handle. 

Will Intel shares fly in Trump's America First era? 

Tyler Durden Thu, 04/03/2025 - 16:40
https://ift.tt/BVQsvab
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BVQsvab
via IFTTT

Intel, TSMC Tentatively Agree On Chipmaking JV In 'America First' Era  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Matt Taibbi Files $10 Million Libel Suit Against Dem Rep. For Accusing Him Of 'Serial Sexual Harassment'

Journalist Matt Taibbi is suing Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove for libel, after the California Democrat claimed during her opening remarks in a House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee hearing on Tuesday that he's a "serial sexual harasser."

"To distract from the dumpster fire this administration is pursuing," she said, the Republicans were "elevating a serial sexual harrasser as their star witness."

While Taibbi wouldn't have been able to sue due to lawmaker protections under the Speech and Debate clause of the constitution, Kamlager-Dove was stupid enough to then post those claims on social media; both on X and Blue Sky.

As Taibbi directly notes to Kamlager-Dove via Racket News, "Rep. Kamlager-Dove, no woman has ever accused me of engaging in sexual harrassment once, let alone serially. See you in court. Please do not evade service." 

*  *  *

On Sale! Grab a complete 2-day emergency survival backpack at ZH Store

Click pic... add to cart (one for each car & your go-bag storage)... be more prepared. Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.
Tyler Durden Thu, 04/03/2025 - 16:20
https://ift.tt/AepPB59
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/AepPB59
via IFTTT

Matt Taibbi Files $10 Million Libel Suit Against Dem Rep. For Accusing Him Of 'Serial Sexual Harassment' SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Microsoft Scales Back AI Data Center Projects In US, Australia, UK

TD Cowen analyst Michael Elias has explained to clients through multiple notes over the last month that Microsoft has scaled back on data center projects in the U.S. and Europe. This development is unsurprising, as readers have been aware of the emerging risks posed by the cheaper and more efficient Chinese DeepSeek (as noted on Jan. 27), prompting us to question whether AI data capacity will be achieved sooner than initially anticipated.

Another worrying sign for the AI bubble—or rather, a continuation of Elias' reporting on Microsoft scaling back data center projects—comes from Bloomberg, which provides additional color on MSFT supposedly halting data center construction sites in Indonesia, the UK, Australia, Illinois, North Dakota, and Wisconsin

Here's more from the report, citing people familiar with talks (list courtesy of Bloomberg):

  • Microsoft recently withdrew from negotiations to lease space between London and Cambridge in the UK at a site being marketed for its ability to host advanced Nvidia chips, according to people familiar with the talks, who requested anonymity to discuss a private matter.

  • The company has also halted negotiations for data center space at a site near Chicago, according to a person familiar with the talks.

  • In some cases, Microsoft is delaying construction. For example, it has paused work on parts of a data center campus it owns about an hour outside of Jakarta, according to people familiar with the situation.

  • Microsoft also has put on hold some planned expansion at a site in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, part of a complex visited by then-President Joe Biden, according to another person.

  • In London, Microsoft was negotiating to lease space at Ada Infrastructure's 210-megawatt Docklands data center but has held off on committing to the project, according to people familiar with the matter.

Elias first raised concerns about Microsoft scaling back on AI computing capacity in a note on Feb. 24, in which he stated that Microsoft was terminating AI data center leases. This was followed by a separate note last week, in which the analyst reported that Microsoft had walked away from data center projects in the U.S. and Europe, amounting to a capacity of approximately 2 gigawatts of electricity.

"We continue to believe the lease cancellations and deferrals of capacity points to data center oversupply relative to its current demand forecast," Elias said last week. 

News of the cheaper Chinese DeepSeek—a response to OpenAI's ChatGPT—in late January, which is allegedly 40–50 times more efficient than other large language models, had Goldman's Rich Privorotsky at the time proposing a new theme that spelled bad news for the AI bubble: "If you can do more with less, it naturally raises the question of whether so much capacity is necessary."

The whole "do more with less" theme produced by DeepSeek sparked a debate that AI peak demand capacity could be reached much sooner than Goldman's forecast of late 2026. 

Capex revisions next?

Year to date, Goldman's AI and power baskets have gotten the memo...

Goldman's China AI basket leads US AI baskets.

. . .

Tyler Durden Thu, 04/03/2025 - 15:25
https://ift.tt/XfvkDWq
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/XfvkDWq
via IFTTT

Microsoft Scales Back AI Data Center Projects In US, Australia, UK SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend