| 0 comments ]

Improper US Government Payments Rose To $186 Billion In 2025: Watchdog

Authored by Sylvia Xu via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Federal government agencies reported a total estimate of about $186 billion in improper payments in fiscal year 2025, an increase of $24 billion from 2024.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office building in Washington on May 22, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

About $153 billion—roughly 82 percent—of this total arose from overpayments.

The Government Accountability Office estimated that cumulative improper payments have reached about $3 trillion since fiscal year 2003. The actual amount may be much higher, the federal watchdog acknowledged in an April 27 report.

These improper payments represent false distributions—such as payments made to the wrong people, paid without proper documentation, or issued in the incorrect amount—from 64 programs reported by 15 federal agencies, and have been a government-wide issue for more than 20 years.

For fiscal year 2025, eight federal programs reported improper payment estimates of $5 billion or more.

Medicaid ($37 billion), Traditional Medicare ($28.8 billion), and Medicare Advantage ($23.7 billion) accounted for more than 50 percent of these erroneous payments.

Medicaid improper payments expanded by $6.3 billion in 2025, compared to the previous year. The Department of Health and Human Services stated that this was due to increased errors in eligibility redeterminations and provider screening as COVID-19 enrollment flexibilities phased out.

The Earned Income Tax Credit ($21 billion), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ($10 billion), and the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant program ($10 billion) added up to more than 20 percent of the total improper payments.

Improper payments arising from the Earned Income Tax Credit—a refundable federal tax credit for low-to-moderate-income working individuals and families—increased by $5.2 billion. The Department of the Treasury has not provided reasons for the improper payments.

Improper Payment Rates

Of the programs reporting improper payment estimates, 19 reported improper payment rates of at least 10 percent, including six programs whose rates exceeded 25 percent.

The Small Business Administration reported improper payments in the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant program for the first time in fiscal year 2025.

The grant program aimed to help the live arts and entertainment industry survive the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, Congress provided $16.25 billion to the Small Business Administration, which awarded grants to 13,011 different businesses and organizations.

Nearly 70 percent of these distributions were erroneous payments, according to the federal watchdog.

As of October 2024, the small-business agency identified $544 million in potential improper payments that need to be recovered. However, the agency sent only one demand letter in January 2024 and paused the issuance of additional demand letters, according to a 2025 audit report.

As of March 2025, no cases had been referred to the Treasury Department for debt collection.

The improper payment rate in the Emergency Conservation Program for disasters—providing funding and technical assistance to farmers and ranchers to repair and restore farmland affected by natural disasters—reached 55.5 percent in 2025, up from 45.2 percent in 2024 and 40.4 percent in 2023.

The causes of improper payments can range from unintentional administrative errors to fraud, according to a 2024 federal watchdog report. An error could occur when an agency failed to obtain a required signature in a contract prior to payment. Fraud occurred when a recipient used a fake or stolen identity to apply for and receive benefits.

Agencies also suspected significant improper payments in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, which spent around $16.5 billion in fiscal year 2025. As of April 2026, Congress had not yet enacted legislation to require states to report the data needed to estimate and report on improper payments for this program.

Lawrence Wilson contributed to the report.

Tyler Durden Tue, 04/28/2026 - 17:00
https://ift.tt/ixlTIF2
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ixlTIF2
via IFTTT

Improper US Government Payments Rose To $186 Billion In 2025: Watchdog SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

The Assassination Wasn't "Staged", Leftists Are Just Evil

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us

Why is it that every time a leftist tries to kill conservatives, it’s immediately called a “false flag”? And why is every single person who dares to question the false flag narrative attacked by a vicious (and suspiciously organized) online mob? The reason should be obvious but some people just don’t seem to see it: It’s a leftist psyop.

In what is now the THIRD failed assassination attempt on Donald Trump, Cole Tomas Allen, a donator to the Kamala Harris campaign, a No Kings protester, a BlueSky leftist and transgender defender, burst into the lobby of the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner with firearms in an attempt to kill Donald Trump or anyone else in the administration that happened to be a convenient target.

His manifesto reads like most leftist manifestos, and his social media is worse. Infested with mainstream media talking points, infecting his brain with delusions of heroism if only he can “take out the fascists”.

There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever which side this guy is on. He is a full bore woke zealot brainwashed by typical Democrat rhetoric. And yes, he’s a part time teacher of high school children (let that sink in before you send your kids off to public school).

The online response from the political left within minutes of the attack was predictable, as if they had all received a script to recite whenever assassination attempts on Trump occur. The same people who call for Trump’s murder daily are now saying the event was “staged”. Furthermore, they claim that a long time woke leftist somehow volunteered to help Trump stage an assassination by risking prison time or death.

I’ve heard of bipartisan cooperation, but this is ridiculous. Lefties are really bending over backwards to help a Republican president with his image. Sadly, there were people in the alternative media that also immediately bought into this lie and repeated it. But why?

Leftists are repeating the false flag theory. The establishment media entertains the false flag theory. Why are some conservatives helping them spread these fallacies?

I think it’s important to take this opportunity to examine how 4th Generation Warfare works; first by understanding the reality that portions of the conservative movement are being targeted with it by the left wing, often effectively. The leftists have figured you out.

4th Gen Warfare is asymmetric and aims to break a movement’s political will. It works by striking at the psychological unity of an enemy group and dividing them; this requires that you identify certain cognitive biases within a portion of that group and exploit those biases to create infighting. The group in question is the “truth” or “conspiracy” element of the wider conservative or MAGA movement.

Has any popular conspiracy theorist today considered the possibility that they are being played? Have they considered the possibility that one of the biggest conspiracies of our era is the agenda to misdirect the public away from punishing the leftist cult for their numerous trespasses?

As a conspiracy “realist” for many years, I think the most important thing to remember is this: Not everything is a conspiracy. If you think everything is a conspiracy, I’m sorry to break it to you, but you are wrong and you are doing far more harm to the truth movement than you are doing good.

One of the most critical changes in the western world that is rarely talked about is that conspiracy movements now have substantial political power and social influence. For generations we were called “fringe”; the crazed and irrational dregs, the deplorables. Today, we have vast reach (online and offline) that stretches across America and into Europe.

Today, everything we say has the potential to affect government policies, elections and even wars (if we remain unified). When a movement grows this strong, its enemies can only seek to destroy it by sabotaging it from within.

By extension, there are numerous think-tanks, NGOs and covert operations designed specifically to find our weaknesses and manipulate our discourse (the SPLC is currently being indicted for such operations). More than anything, the enemy cares about what we think.

And what is our greatest weakness? What do these groups consistently exploit to keep us passive and ineffective? The core weakness of conspiracy theorists is paranoia.

Our willingness to “question everything” can sometimes be used against us to misdirect us into rabbit holes that simply don’t exist. Globalists and the political left have quickly learned that the best way to keep conservatives docile is to make us suspect our own side so much that we never turn our anger against the woke cabal.

Two decades ago when I got my start working in the alternative media, the concept of the “false left/right paradigm” was everywhere. It was the key argument of the truth/liberty movement. The idea that progressives and conservatives are actually much more alike than they know. That we all Americans basically want the same things, and the only obstacle dividing us is the fake “uniparty” at the top.

I’m sorry to break it to the people who have attached their entire political philosophy to this idea, but the false left/right paradigm is dead. It no longer exists.

It died at least a decade ago when Democrats and progressives embraced the woke cult, and in the process they became willing allies of the globalists. Where does almost all the globalist NGO money go? Into Democrat campaigns and woke activist groups What group receives the majority of globalist corporate support? Leftists. Who tries to implement nearly every policy that comes out of globalist conferences like Davos? The political left.

Hell, 90% of Jeffrey Epstein’s campaign donations went to Democrats. It was Epstein that was personally in contact with Democrats, texting them and helping them eith their witch hunt proceedings against Donald Trump. The political left is the machine of the globalists. Everything they promote, from transgenderism to open borders to climate controls is part of the globalist religion. They all a part of the same entity.

And now, they’re trying to kill us wherever they get a chance. They are openly proud of this fact and they represent around 25% of the population. Cole Allen isn’t a radical by today’s standards, he is the common denominator within the Democratic Party.

Meaning, leftist and conservatives are true enemies, from the bottom of the pyramid to the top. We do not want the same things. Not even close. There can be no reconciliation, and this only ends one way.

They know this and they are waging a psychological war against us. Think about it: Every new conspiracy narrative is designed to distract us from the culpability of the political left. When an attack or assassination takes place, the blame is always aimed at someone else.

The mountains of evidence proving that the attackers are militant leftists is ignored in favor of anecdotes, hearsay and outright lies. Here is how the formula works, as far as I can tell. It’s complicated, but hear me out…

1) If an assassination against a conservative fails, then it was “staged” by that conservative.

2) If an assassination against a conservative succeeds, leftists celebrate, and then claim “Israel did it”.

Okay, maybe it’s not so complicated. We witnessed this with the Charlie Kirk assassination. According to the arrest record and court documentation, Tyler Robinson, a far left activist with a trans furry boyfriend, confessed to his parents that he shot Kirk, which is why his parents convinced him to turn himself in.

His boyfriend gave photographic evidence of a hand-written confession to the feds. The note was composed by Robinson in the event that he died during the assassination. This is also on record with the court.

Everything points to Robinson because he is the person who most likely pulled the trigger (which is what he admitted to his parents). There is no grand scheme to frame him. Unless Robinson’s parents AND his boyfriend are in on the plan, there is no debate. The conspiracy theories fall apart.

When it comes to Trump, I have been highly critical in the past, specifically during his first term when he formed a horrific swamp creature cabinet. That said, it’s impossible to deny that his second term has been a 180 degree turnaround. Nearly every campaign promise he made has been carried out or at least attempted despite Democrat (and Neocon) interference.

If you are angry about the war in Iran, that’s fine, but Trump has been talking about removing the Islamic regime in Iran since the 1980s. Any Trump voter who is surprised by this did not do their homework. Entertaining baseless false flag assassination theories is not going to help end the war faster.

For the political left, jumping to conclusions and promoting disinformation is designed to control the narrative and sow division before all the facts can be examined. To plant theories in people’s heads and inoculate them to reasonable discourse.

For truth movement people buying into the disinformation, just know that you are being programmed. It doesn’t matter if you like Trump or hate Trump; like his policies or hate his policies. The facts don’t care about your emotion-based theories. If you’re going to attack him, at least make sure your reasons are legit.

The purpose of the “staged” narrative, as I mentioned, is to sow confusion, doubt and division within patriot circles. Globalists and leftists don’t want conservatives to fight back. They don’t want us organized or unified. They want us apathetic and aimlessly fighting with each other. The gas-lighting must end.

Tyler Durden Tue, 04/28/2026 - 16:20
https://ift.tt/wBn7lj1
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wBn7lj1
via IFTTT

The Assassination Wasn't "Staged", Leftists Are Just Evil SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

"Unprecedented": Travel Prices Expected To Soar To And From World Cup Matches This Summer

Traveling to matches during the 2026 FIFA World Cup may prove to be one of the biggest hurdles for fans, with transportation costs and logistics shaping up to be a major concern across U.S. host cities, according to Bloomberg.

Prices for getting to stadiums are expected to spike due to high demand, limited parking, and reliance on rideshare services, where surge pricing could make even short trips expensive. 

Costs for simply getting to and from matches could vary widely depending on the city and mode of travel. Rideshare prices are expected to surge during peak game times, potentially reaching hundreds of dollars for relatively short distances, while limited stadium parking could also carry premium rates or require advance reservations.

In some regions, special event transit fares may climb significantly higher than normal daily prices, with round-trip tickets potentially reaching well over $100 for high-demand routes. For those seeking convenience, private shuttles and chartered services will likely come at a steep markup, and luxury options like helicopter transfers—already being advertised for tens of thousands of dollars—highlight just how expensive last-mile transportation could become during the tournament.

Chopper rides could wind up "costing as much as $30,000 for a group of eight passengers." the report notes.

Bloomberg writes that public transit agencies are preparing for a massive influx of riders, but upgrades and expanded service come with significant costs. In some areas, fares are expected to rise sharply, and not all stadiums will be easily accessible by train or bus. Officials are working to expand capacity, but many systems are still recovering from pandemic-era budget shortfalls, making it difficult to scale up quickly.

At the same time, tensions are growing over who should pay for these improvements. State and local leaders argue that hosting the tournament should not burden everyday commuters with higher costs.

New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill emphasized this stance, saying, “We are committed to ensuring costs are shared fairly,” and adding, “We will not be subsidizing World Cup ticket holders on the backs of New Jerseyans who rely on NJ Transit every day.” With only limited federal funding available, cities are under pressure to find solutions before millions of visitors arrive.

FIFA says that host cities are expected to expand transit services, manage crowds, and cover security-related logistics, all of which come with significant expenses. Some state leaders, including New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill, have argued that FIFA should help cover those costs rather than shifting the burden onto taxpayers or everyday commuters. FIFA, however, maintains that its agreements with host cities already allow agencies to charge riders enough to cover expenses, marking a shift from earlier arrangements that required free public transportation for ticket holders.

FIFA officials pushed back strongly on the idea of contributing additional funds, signaling tension as planning ramps up. The organization said it was “quite surprised” by calls to share transportation costs and defended its existing agreements with host cities.

“To arbitrarily set elevated prices and demand FIFA absorb these costs is unprecedented,” said Heimo Schirgi. “No other global event, concert or major sporting promoter has faced such a demand.” 

Tyler Durden Mon, 04/27/2026 - 14:25
https://ift.tt/nJlTzva
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/nJlTzva
via IFTTT

"Unprecedented": Travel Prices Expected To Soar To And From World Cup Matches This Summer SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Ford Denies Talks With Geely About Bringing Chinese Car Tech To U.S.

On Friday, a report crossed the wire that Ford and Geely had been in discussions about collaborating more closely, including whether their developing European partnership could expand into the U.S. market, according to the Wall Street Journal

Ford denied the claims, which stated that one idea involved Ford using Geely’s vehicle technology domestically. The talks had reportedly cooled, with both sides shifting attention back to Europe, where they are considering sharing production capacity and technical resources.

Geely is motivated to enter the U.S., a lucrative but tightly restricted market for Chinese automakers. High tariffs, bans on Chinese-connected vehicle software, and political resistance from U.S. industry and lawmakers all make entry difficult.

Ford itself has signaled caution, with leadership stressing the importance of protecting American jobs and competitiveness. A company spokesman reinforced that stance, saying, “Our commitment to a level playing field and safeguarding our home market remains absolute.”

The WSJ wrote on Friday that Geely, for its part, has kept its response general, noting, “We always keep an open mind when it comes to exploring cooperative opportunities,” while avoiding specifics about any potential deal.

Earlier discussions went further than simple cooperation, including the possibility of Ford building future models on a Geely-developed platform and leveraging its engineering to speed up EV development. Geely also explored using Ford’s existing manufacturing footprint—particularly in Europe—to bypass trade barriers and scale production more efficiently. While those ideas remain on the table in some form, they highlight how both companies see strategic value in collaboration, even as geopolitical tensions limit how far that cooperation can extend.

Later in the day on Friday after the report, Ford "denied a news report that it has held talks with Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. about bringing Chinese car technology to the US market", claiming "no such talks" happened. 

The broader context is intensifying global competition: Chinese automakers are gaining ground internationally with cheaper, tech-focused vehicles, putting pressure on Western companies. Even so, any attempt to formalize a U.S. partnership would face significant political scrutiny, making overseas collaboration a more practical path for now.

Tyler Durden Sun, 04/26/2026 - 18:23
https://ift.tt/bpXKnTh
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/bpXKnTh
via IFTTT

Ford Denies Talks With Geely About Bringing Chinese Car Tech To U.S. SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
| 0 comments ]

Will the Left Make The WHCA Dinner Shooter A Hero?

There was a lot of confusion in the initial hours after the shooting at the White House Correspondents Association Dinner at the Washington Hilton on Saturday night. But it soon became clear that the suspect, Cole Allen, a 31-year-old teacher from Torrance, California, had rabid anti-Trump views and was there to target Trump administration officials. 

While the usual suspects on the left are issuing standard statements condemning violence, there’s a real concern that the left will lionize Allen. And even former Obama official and current CNN pundit Van Jones is concerned about it.

 "I'm starting to worry about something,” Jones said. “Which is that the shooter survived, which means on Monday he's going to court, which means there is a danger that people try to make him some sort of hero."

He wasn't being paranoid. He was being prescient. And he didn't stop there.

"You watch what happened with Luigi, who shot a CEO to death, and somehow became a hero," Jones continued. " So, they said tonight you saw the worst of America. You saw the best of America. Tonight, you definitely saw the best of America. I hope on Monday we don’t see the worst again. I just want to say very clearly — this kind of despicable behavior has no place in America. It has no place on the right. It has no place on the left.”

He added, “This kind of behavior has no place in America. And it is wrong. Violence is not the way to resolve any grievances. And this cheerleader culture for violence, for people who think that the answer to our problems is to go shooting billionaires or going to synagogues or all these different things, has to be called out immediately. The minute it starts, every single person with the platform must denounce it, or we’re going to see this again.”

When Luigi Mangione was arrested in December 2024 for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, the radical left treated him like a celebrity. Within days of the shooting, social media flooded with memes casting Mangione as a modern-day vigilante, a working-class avenger striking back against the healthcare system. 

Online stores moved T-shirts. A fundraiser for his legal defense pulled in thousands. Even the Saturday Night Live audience cheered when Mangione’s name was mentioned during a Weekend Update segment.

Mainstream journalists didn't exactly pump the brakes either. CNN's Kaitlan Collins, a White House correspondent no less, casually directed her audience to Mangione's legal defense website.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said Sunday that "preliminary" findings suggest Trump and members of his administration were the likely targets. Allen had been staying at the hotel as a registered guest. Investigators secured his room and began reviewing what CBS News and others described as his manifesto.

According to the New York Post, Allen’s manifesto ran over a thousand words, laying out a delusional justification for the shooting. In it, he described himself as a “Friendly Federal Assassin,” outlined “rules of engagement,” and claimed it was his moral duty to target officials tied to the Trump administration. 

Democrats moved quickly to condemn the shooting on Saturday. The statements were prompt and broadly worded. But the uncomfortable overlap between the suspect's stated grievances and the party’s rhetoric about Trump is hard to ignore, making Van Jones’s concerns extremely valid. 

Tyler Durden Sun, 04/26/2026 - 16:55
https://ift.tt/v8I7KVZ
from ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/v8I7KVZ
via IFTTT

Will the Left Make The WHCA Dinner Shooter A Hero? SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend